Rightsy — Protect your rights: IP search and flat-fee legal services

Search trademarks

TTAB decisions › 2013

TTAB decisions, 2013

The 740 TTAB decisions issued in 2013, 49 of them precedential — oppositions, cancellations and ex parte appeals with their outcomes and grounds, precedential decisions first.

Page 1 of 8 · Next page

Decisions

  1. Petition to cancel granted — ACTIVETECH — TTAB cancellation decision, granted · precedential · marks: ACTIVETECH · No. 92054730
  2. Opposition dismissed on likelihood of confusion — SKINCODE 2 v. SWISSCODE — TTAB opposition decision, dismissed · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: SWISSCODE, SKINCODE 2 · No. 91206091
  3. Refusal affirmed on section §2(a) — LAKOTA — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(a) · marks: LAKOTA · No. 85328868
  4. Opposition sustained — MICROFIX v. MICROFX — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · precedential · marks: MICROFX, MICROFIX · No. 91209134
  5. Opposition sustained on likelihood of confusion — SWATCH v. IWATCH — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion, Section 1(b) - Bona Fide Intent · marks: IWATCH, SWATCH, SWATCH QUARTZ, SWATCH · No. 91187092
  6. Opposition decided in part on likelihood of confusion — Delaware Quarries, Inc. v. PlayCore IP Sub, Inc. — TTAB opposition decision, mixed · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion · No. 91190282RE
  7. Opposition sustained on use in commerce (e.g., nonuse, unlawful use) — CLOROX v. CLOROTEC — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · precedential · Use in Commerce (e.g., nonuse, unlawful use) · marks: CLOROTEC, CLOROX, CLOROX, CLOROX · No. 91198922
  8. Refusal affirmed on section §2(a) — THE SLANTS — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(a) · marks: THE SLANTS · No. 85472044
  9. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — SUPERJAWS — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: SUPERJAWS · No. 77920346
  10. Opposition sustained on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — FOOTLONG — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers, Section 2(f) · marks: FOOTLONG · No. 91192657
  11. Order: Motion granted in part and denied in part — PHILLIES v. GREENPHLY — TTAB opposition decision, mixed · precedential · marks: GREENPHLY, TEAMPHLY, PHILLIES, PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES · No. 91199364
  12. Opposition decided in part on likelihood of confusion — ZILLA v. PETZILLA — TTAB opposition decision, mixed · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: PETZILLA, ZILLA, ZILLA · No. 91190058
  13. Opposition decided in part on likelihood of confusion — ZILLA v. DOGZILLA — TTAB opposition decision, mixed · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: DOGZILLA, ZILLA, ZILLA · No. 91188816
  14. Petition to cancel decided in part on likelihood of confusion — ZILLA v. DOGZILLA — TTAB cancellation decision, mixed · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: DOGZILLA, ZILLA · No. 92050852
  15. Refusal affirmed on section §2(a) — AWSHIT WORKS — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(a) · marks: AWSHIT WORKS · No. 85247730
  16. Opposition sustained on section §2(e)(5) - functionality — AS Holdings, Inc. v. H & C Milcor, Inc., f/k/a Aquatico of Texas, Inc. — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · precedential · Section 2(e)(5) - Functionality, Configuration/Trade Dress, Section 2(f) · No. 91182064
  17. Opposition dismissed on likelihood of confusion — STATE OF ALABAMA TRADEMARK REGISTRATION NO. 103-820 FOR PAUL W. BRYANT MUSEUM & DESIGN v. HOUNDSTOOTH MAFIA — TTAB opposition decision, dismissed · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion, Section 2(a) · marks: HOUNDSTOOTH MAFIA · No. 91187103
  18. Opposition sustained on likelihood of confusion — ROLEX v. ROLL-X — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion, Section 43(c) - Dilution, Section 1(b) - Bona Fide Intent · marks: ROLL-X, ROLEX · No. 91188993
  19. Refusal affirmed on section §2(a) — AOP — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(a), Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers, Sections 1, (2), (3), and 45, Requirements · marks: AOP · No. 85009094
  20. Order: Motion Granted in Part — CAYMUS v. CAYMUS MEDICAL — TTAB opposition decision, mixed · precedential · Fraud and/or mistake · marks: CAYMUS MEDICAL, CAYMUS MEDICAL, CAYMUS · No. 91204667
  21. Petition to cancel decided in part on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — ANNAPOLIS TOURS — TTAB cancellation decision, mixed · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers, Fraud and/or mistake, Section 2(f) · marks: ANNAPOLIS TOURS · No. 92050879
  22. Opposition sustained on likelihood of confusion — GOTT v. GOTT LIGHT — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: GOTT LIGHT, GOTT, JOEL GOTT · No. 91197659
  23. Refusal affirmed on requirements — F — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Requirements · marks: F · No. 85202870
  24. Petition to cancel granted on ownership — NIC OUT — TTAB cancellation decision, granted · precedential · Ownership · marks: NIC OUT · No. 92051140
  25. Opposition decided in part on likelihood of confusion — CHATEAUNEUF-DU-PAPE CONTROLE v. CHEMIN DES PAPES — TTAB opposition decision, mixed · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion, Section 1(b) - Bona Fide Intent · marks: CHEMIN DES PAPES, CHATEAUNEUF-DU-PAPE CONTROLE · No. 91179408
  26. Refusal affirmed on sections 1, (2), (3), and 45 — NO MORE RINOS! — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Sections 1, (2), (3), and 45 · marks: NO MORE RINOS! · No. 77666826
  27. Opposition dismissed — RIALTO CINEMAS — TTAB opposition decision, dismissed · precedential · marks: RIALTO CINEMAS · No. 91197602
  28. Order: Motion Denied — INTRAV — TTAB cancellation decision, denied · precedential · marks: INTRAV, INTRAV · No. 92055645
  29. Stipulation Approved — CHANEL — TTAB opposition decision, other · precedential · Section 43(c) - Dilution · marks: CHANEL, CHANEL, CHANEL, CHANEL · No. 91208352
  30. Order: All motions denied — TEMPUR-PEDIC v. BODIPEDIC — TTAB cancellation decision, denied · precedential · marks: BODIPEDIC, TEMPUR-PEDIC · No. 92054201
  31. Petition to cancel granted on specimen issues — TREASURYNET — TTAB cancellation decision, granted · precedential · Specimen issues, Abandonment/Nonuse · marks: TREASURYNET · No. 92050730
  32. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(5) - functionality — Florists' Transworld Delivery, Inc. — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(e)(5) - Functionality, Sections 1, (2), (3), and 45, Section 2(f) · No. 77590475
  33. Refusal decided in part on likelihood of confusion — FORZA — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, mixed · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: FORZA · No. 77629624
  34. Order: Motion Granted — RTX Scientific, Incorporated v. Nu-Calgon Wholesaler, Inc. — TTAB cancellation decision, granted · precedential · No. 92055285
  35. Parties? Stipulation Denied — BIG MAC v. MACVISION — TTAB opposition decision, denied · precedential · marks: MACVISION, BIG MAC, BIG MAC, BIG MAC · No. 91208437
  36. Concurrent use proceeding granted — 3 PALMS HOTELS & RESORTS — TTAB concurrent use decision, granted · precedential · marks: 3 PALMS HOTELS & RESORTS, 3 PALMS RESORT, 3 PALMS HOTEL, 3 PALMS · No. 94002407
  37. Refusal affirmed on section §2(a) — WHITE JASMINE — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(a), Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers, Section 2(f) · marks: WHITE JASMINE · No. 77115548
  38. Refusal affirmed on sections 1, (2), (3), and 45 — EMPOWERING THE INVESTOR — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Sections 1, (2), (3), and 45 · marks: EMPOWERING THE INVESTOR · No. 77080379
  39. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(5) - functionality — G. Pohl-Boskamp GmbH & Co. KG — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(e)(5) - Functionality, Sections 1, (2), (3), and 45, Section 2(f) · No. 85007428
  40. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(5) - functionality — G. Pohl-Boskamp GmbH & Co. KG — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(e)(5) - Functionality, Sections 1, (2), (3), and 45, Section 2(f) · No. 85008626
  41. Opposition decided in part on likelihood of confusion — ER/STUDIO v. RSTUDIO — TTAB opposition decision, mixed · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: RSTUDIO, RSTUDIO, RSTUDIO, ER/STUDIO · No. 91193335
  42. Refusal affirmed on use in commerce (e.g., nonuse, unlawful use) — PLAQUE-ZAPPER — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Use in Commerce (e.g., nonuse, unlawful use) · marks: PLAQUE-ZAPPER · No. 77980412
  43. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — LOTUS — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: LOTUS · No. 85111552
  44. Refusal affirmed on sensory marks — Powermat USA, LLC — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Sensory Marks · No. 77715052
  45. Refusal affirmed on sensory marks — POWERMAT USA, LLC — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Sensory Marks · No. 77715011
  46. Refusal affirmed on sections 1, (2), (3), and 45 — BLATANCY — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Sections 1, (2), (3), and 45 · marks: BLATANCY · No. 77366417
  47. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(5) - functionality — Mars, Incorporated — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(e)(5) - Functionality, Sections 1, (2), (3), and 45 · No. 77545810
  48. Refusal affirmed on sections 1, (2), (3), and 45 — Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Sections 1, (2), (3), and 45 · No. 77455710
  49. Opposition sustained on section §2(e)(4) - primarily merely a surname — MILLER LAW GROUP, P.C. (ALTHOUGH OPPOSER ASSERTS THIS IS ITS NAME AND/OR TRADE NAME) v. MILLER LAW GROUP — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · precedential · Section 2(e)(4) - Primarily Merely a Surname, Section 2(f) · marks: MILLER LAW GROUP · No. 91184841
  50. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — BOW — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: BOW · No. 85590109
  51. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — MOTHER EARTH BREWING — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: MOTHER EARTH BREWING · No. 77716598
  52. Opposition sustained on likelihood of confusion — MILKSHAKE — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: MILKSHAKE, MILK SHAKE, MILKSHAKE · No. 91200575
  53. Opposition dismissed on likelihood of confusion — SUNBUM v. SUN BUM — TTAB opposition decision, dismissed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: SUN BUM, SUNBUM · No. 91194831
  54. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — SUPER-PHARM — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: SUPER-PHARM · No. 85521587
  55. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — INFINITETOUCH — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: INFINITETOUCH · No. 85535771
  56. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — NUTRATEK — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: NUTRATEK · No. 85577160
  57. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — BONFIRE WINGS GENUINE CREOLE, UNIQUELY CAJUN! — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: BONFIRE WINGS GENUINE CREOLE, UNIQUELY CAJUN! · No. 85521900
  58. Opposition sustained on likelihood of confusion — FAEMA v. FAEDA — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: FAEDA, FAEMA, FAEMA · No. 91203495
  59. Petition to cancel decided in part on other grounds for refusal/claims/substantive issues — TRACIE MARTYN v. BABY BUTTER ORIGINALS BY TRACEY MARTIN — TTAB cancellation decision, mixed · Other Grounds for Refusal/Claims/Substantive Issues · marks: BABY BUTTER ORIGINALS BY TRACEY MARTIN, TRACIE MARTYN, TRACIE MARTYN, RESCULPTING BODY SERUM BY TRACIE MARTYN · No. 92053374
  60. Refusal reversed on geographic terms — ASHBURN — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal reversed · Geographic terms · marks: ASHBURN · No. 85322001
  61. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — NOPALEA — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: NOPALEA · No. 77658158
  62. Refusal affirmed on sections 1, (2), (3), and 45 — SHIMMERING BALLERINAS & DANCERS — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Sections 1, (2), (3), and 45, Section 2(f) · marks: SHIMMERING BALLERINAS & DANCERS · No. 76293326
  63. Refusal affirmed on sections 1, (2), (3), and 45 — SHIMMERING RAINFOREST — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Sections 1, (2), (3), and 45, Section 2(f) · marks: SHIMMERING RAINFOREST · No. 76293327
  64. Refusal affirmed on section §2(a) — NO $#!+ — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Section 2(a) · marks: NO $#!+ · No. 85855449
  65. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — GUARD MASTER — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: GUARD MASTER · No. 85338849
  66. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — FOOD MATTERS MARKET — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: FOOD MATTERS MARKET · No. 85521074
  67. Refusal reversed — BOURGOGNE DES FLANDRES — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal reversed · marks: BOURGOGNE DES FLANDRES · No. 85501340
  68. Petition to cancel granted on likelihood of confusion — POMEGRANATE — TTAB cancellation decision, granted · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: POMEGRANATE, POMEGRANATE · No. 92054073
  69. Petition to cancel granted on likelihood of confusion — POMEGRANATE v. POMEGRANATE MARKET — TTAB cancellation decision, granted · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: POMEGRANATE MARKET, POMEGRANATE · No. 92054076
  70. Opposition decided in part on likelihood of confusion — HAFA ADAI — TTAB opposition decision, mixed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: HAFA ADAI, HAFA ADAI · No. 91207808
  71. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — THE COOLER COMPANY — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: THE COOLER COMPANY · No. 85980011
  72. Opposition sustained on likelihood of confusion — New Jersey Basketball, LLC v. Cybervillage Corporation — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · Likelihood of Confusion, Section 2(a), Section 43(c) - Dilution, Abandonment/Nonuse · No. 91201370RE
  73. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — ZIPTOLL — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: ZIPTOLL · No. 85100224
  74. Refusal reversed on likelihood of confusion — BENTLEY — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal reversed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: BENTLEY · No. 85325994
  75. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — Joseph Tsiyoni d/b/a Shairon Int'l Trade — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · No. 85737891RE
  76. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — LAZZARO — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: LAZZARO · No. 77942234
  77. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — W THE WORKS GOURMET BURGER BISTRO — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: W THE WORKS GOURMET BURGER BISTRO · No. 76704957
  78. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — WINERY DOGS — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: WINERY DOGS · No. 85299521
  79. Opposition sustained on likelihood of confusion — ACT v. ACTRX — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: ACTRX, ACTRX, ACT, ACT RESTORING · No. 91200421
  80. Refusal decided in part on likelihood of confusion — THE WORKS — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, mixed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: THE WORKS · No. 76704958
  81. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — TECHWOOL — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: TECHWOOL · No. 85512862
  82. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — ZERO EMISSIONS — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: ZERO EMISSIONS · No. 77427844
  83. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — VICTORY — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: VICTORY · No. 85588592
  84. Refusal reversed on section §2(a) — ADVANCED ARMAMENT CORP. SILENCERS MADE IN THE USA — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal reversed · Section 2(a) · marks: ADVANCED ARMAMENT CORP. SILENCERS MADE IN THE USA · No. 77770899
  85. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — THE WORKS GOURMET BURGER BISTRO — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: THE WORKS GOURMET BURGER BISTRO · No. 76704959
  86. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — FREEBIRD BY STEVEN — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: FREEBIRD BY STEVEN · No. 85313681
  87. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — CUDDLEUP FRIENDS — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: CUDDLEUP FRIENDS · No. 76709622
  88. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — CUDDLEUPPET — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: CUDDLEUPPET · No. 76709776
  89. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — AY LAZZARO — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: AY LAZZARO · No. 85253147
  90. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — GRAIN AUDIO — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: GRAIN AUDIO · No. 85528202
  91. Refusal affirmed — ENGINEER FOCUSED NAVIGATION — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · marks: ENGINEER FOCUSED NAVIGATION · No. 77786012
  92. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — FLUTTER FAERIES — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: FLUTTER FAERIES · No. 85485701
  93. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — ACTIVE GAMING — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: ACTIVE GAMING · No. 85627683
  94. Refusal reversed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — KID SELECTS — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal reversed · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: KID SELECTS · No. 85509120
  95. Refusal affirmed on section §2(a) — BLAZING SILKS — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Section 2(a) · marks: BLAZING SILKS · No. 85456039
  96. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — MICRO INTERVENTIONAL DEVICES — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: MICRO INTERVENTIONAL DEVICES · No. 85446955
  97. Opposition sustained on summary judgment — JOYCE — TTAB opposition decision, granted · Ownership · marks: JOYCE · No. 91180789
  98. Petition to cancel granted on summary judgment — JOYCE — TTAB cancellation decision, granted · Ownership · marks: JOYCE, JOYCE, JOYCE SOHO, JOYCE THEATER · No. 92042019
  99. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — PRIDER — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: PRIDER · No. 85737891
  100. Petition to cancel granted on likelihood of confusion — STP — TTAB cancellation decision, granted · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: STP, STP, STP, STP · No. 92056035

Open this year on Rightsy