Rightsy — Protect your rights: IP search and flat-fee legal services

Search trademarks

TTAB decisions › 2006

TTAB decisions, 2006

The 577 TTAB decisions issued in 2006, 65 of them precedential — oppositions, cancellations and ex parte appeals with their outcomes and grounds, precedential decisions first.

Page 1 of 6 · Next page

Decisions

  1. Refusal reversed on product design — The Black & Decker Corp. — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal reversed · precedential · Product Design, Section 2(f) · No. 76570453
  2. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — ESERVER — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: ESERVER · No. 75581859
  3. Opposition dismissed on geographic terms — VEGAS — TTAB opposition decision, dismissed · precedential · Geographic terms · marks: VEGAS · No. 91162078
  4. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — OUTDOOR PRODUCTS — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers, Section 2(f) · marks: OUTDOOR PRODUCTS · No. 76570321
  5. Refusal affirmed on specimen issues — PSYCHO — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Specimen issues, Likelihood of Confusion · marks: PSYCHO · No. 78249582
  6. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — GALA ROUGE — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: GALA ROUGE · No. 78638129
  7. Opposition dismissed on likelihood of confusion — GENUINE RIDE SKIN CARE — TTAB opposition decision, dismissed · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion, Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: GENUINE RIDE SKIN CARE · No. 91158556
  8. Petition to cancel granted on likelihood of confusion — RAD RIGS v. RAD RODS — TTAB cancellation decision, granted · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: RAD RODS, RAD RIGS · No. 92040128
  9. Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment granted — SMART BROOM — TTAB cancellation decision, granted · precedential · marks: SMART BROOM · No. 92043691
  10. Refusal reversed on specimen issues — WSI — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal reversed · precedential · Specimen issues · marks: WSI · No. 78442207
  11. Refusal reversed on likelihood of confusion — Homeland Vinyl Products, Inc. — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal reversed · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion · No. 76361399
  12. Opposition dismissed — DYKES ON BIKES — TTAB opposition decision, dismissed · precedential · marks: DYKES ON BIKES · No. 91169211
  13. Order: Opposer's motion to modify protective order denied; opposer's motion to re-designate granted in part; opposer required to disclose and permit discovery of any expert witness it intends to depose for rebuttal — Georgia-Pacific Corporation and Fort James Operating Company v. Solo Cup Company — TTAB opposition decision, mixed · precedential · No. 91157923
  14. Opposition decided in part on likelihood of confusion — DARJEELING v. DARJEELING NOUVEAU — TTAB opposition decision, mixed · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion, Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: DARJEELING NOUVEAU, DARJEELING · No. 91118587
  15. Opposition sustained on section §2(e)(5) - functionality — Duramax Marine, LLC v. R.W. Fernstrum & Company — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · precedential · Section 2(e)(5) - Functionality, Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers, Section 2(f) · No. 91119899
  16. Refusal reversed on geographic terms — BALASHI — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal reversed · precedential · Geographic terms · marks: BALASHI · No. 78304953
  17. Refusal reversed on geographic terms — BALASHI BEER — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal reversed · precedential · Geographic terms · marks: BALASHI BEER · No. 78304942
  18. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — NUTRITION BULLETIN — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: NUTRITION BULLETIN · No. 78369245
  19. Refusal affirmed on section §2(a) — MOHAWK — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(a) · marks: MOHAWK · No. 78146926
  20. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — 3-O'S — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: 3-O'S · No. 76561135
  21. Concurrent use proceeding granted — THE COPY CLUB — TTAB concurrent use decision, granted · precedential · marks: THE COPY CLUB, COPY CLUB · No. 94001250
  22. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — WORKPLACEHOMELOANS — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: WORKPLACEHOMELOANS · No. 76560855
  23. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(5) - functionality — HowardLeight Industries, LLC — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(e)(5) - Functionality, Section 2(f) · No. 76439661
  24. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — ARMED ANTIBODIES — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: ARMED ANTIBODIES · No. 76424575
  25. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — JUMP DESIGNS — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: JUMP DESIGNS · No. 76393986
  26. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(5) - functionality — N.V.Organon — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(e)(5) - Functionality, Sections 1, (2), (3), and 45 · No. 76467774
  27. Refusal affirmed on geographic terms — BAIKALSKAYA — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Geographic terms, Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: BAIKALSKAYA · No. 78341041
  28. Opposition sustained on section §2(e)(5) - functionality — American Flange & Manu-facturing Co., Inc. v. Rieke Corp. — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · precedential · Section 2(e)(5) - Functionality, Fraud and/or mistake, Section 2(f) · No. 91153479
  29. Refusal affirmed on specimen issues — ALPHA-DISC — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Specimen issues · marks: ALPHA-DISC · No. 76181456
  30. Opposition sustained on section §2(e)(5) - functionality — American Flange & Manu-facturing Co., Inc. v. Rieke Corp. — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · precedential · Section 2(e)(5) - Functionality, Fraud and/or mistake, Section 2(f) · No. 91154680
  31. Refusal decided in part on section §2(a) — Squaw Valley Develop-ment Company — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, mixed · precedential · Section 2(a) · No. 76511144RE
  32. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — BOX SOLUTIONS — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion, Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: BOX SOLUTIONS · No. 76267086
  33. Refusal decided in part on section §2(a) — Squaw Valley Develop-ment Company — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, mixed · precedential · Section 2(a) · No. 76511145RE
  34. Refusal reversed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — SNAP ON 3000 AIRMATIC — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal reversed · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: SNAP ON 3000 AIRMATIC · No. 76544861
  35. Opposition granted on requirements — ZING v. PINGU — TTAB opposition decision, granted · precedential · Requirements · marks: PINGU, ZING · No. 91101408
  36. Opposition granted on requirements — PING v. PINGU — TTAB opposition decision, granted · precedential · Requirements · marks: PINGU, PING · No. 91108831
  37. Refusal reversed on sections 1, (2), (3), and 45 — INFOMINDER — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal reversed · precedential · Sections 1, (2), (3), and 45 · marks: INFOMINDER · No. 76213721
  38. Refusal affirmed — MARCHE NOIR — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · marks: MARCHE NOIR · No. 78334625
  39. Petition to cancel denied on likelihood of confusion — SUZLON — TTAB cancellation decision, denied · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: SUZLON · No. 92043377
  40. Refusal affirmed on sections 1, (2), (3), and 45 — SPECTRUM — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Sections 1, (2), (3), and 45 · marks: SPECTRUM · No. 76171288
  41. Refusal affirmed on section §2(a) — SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(a) · marks: SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 · No. 78083495
  42. Refusal affirmed on specimen issues — Genitope Corporation — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Specimen issues · No. 76470648
  43. Petition to cancel decided in part on fraud and/or mistake — MAIDS TO ORDER v. MAID TO ORDER — TTAB cancellation decision, mixed · precedential · Fraud and/or mistake · marks: MAID TO ORDER, MAIDS TO ORDER · No. 92040571
  44. Refusal affirmed on section §2(a) — CAFETERIA — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(a) · marks: CAFETERIA · No. 75819306
  45. Order: Summary judgment granted to opposer as to services for which applicant admits non-use; summary judgment denied as to remaining services — GRAND CANYON WEST — TTAB opposition decision, mixed · precedential · Use in Commerce (e.g., nonuse, unlawful use), Fraud and/or mistake · marks: GRAND CANYON WEST · No. 91162008
  46. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — SATURDAY MORNING T.V. — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: SATURDAY MORNING T.V. · No. 78278235
  47. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — SMARTSFP — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: SMARTSFP · No. 76300876
  48. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — FM4910 — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: FM4910 · No. 76310516
  49. Refusal affirmed on section §2(a) — THE BREATHABLE MATTRESS — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(a) · marks: THE BREATHABLE MATTRESS · No. 76565486
  50. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(4) - primarily merely a surname — GIGER MD — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(e)(4) - Primarily Merely a Surname · marks: GIGER MD · No. 76545470
  51. Refusal affirmed on section §2(a) — BULLSHIT — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(a) · marks: BULLSHIT · No. 75788830
  52. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — ERGONOMIC — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: ERGONOMIC · No. 78195616
  53. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — PARTY AT A DISCOUNT! — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: PARTY AT A DISCOUNT! · No. 76541018
  54. Opposition sustained on likelihood of confusion — LESSBUCKS COFFEE — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: LESSBUCKS COFFEE · No. 91156879
  55. Petition to cancel denied on affirmative defenses — GOLD SEAL — TTAB cancellation decision, denied · precedential · Affirmative defenses · marks: GOLD SEAL, GOLD SEAL · No. 92041265
  56. Refusal reversed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — FREEDOM FRIES — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal reversed · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: FREEDOM FRIES · No. 78220033
  57. Opposition dismissed on likelihood of confusion — JACK & JONES — TTAB opposition decision, dismissed · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: JACK & JONES · No. 91163436
  58. Petition to cancel granted on likelihood of confusion — WIRETRACKS — TTAB cancellation decision, granted · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: WIRETRACKS · No. 92043947
  59. Opposition sustained on likelihood of confusion — ISHINE — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: ISHINE · No. 91159335
  60. Refusal reversed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — INSTANT MESSENGER — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal reversed · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: INSTANT MESSENGER · No. 75497543
  61. Refusal reversed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — INSTANT MESSENGER — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal reversed · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: INSTANT MESSENGER · No. 75496386
  62. Refusal reversed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — AOL INSTANT MESSENGER — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal reversed · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: AOL INSTANT MESSENGER · No. 75460305
  63. Refusal reversed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — AOL INSTANT MESSENGER — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal reversed · precedential · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: AOL INSTANT MESSENGER · No. 75460306
  64. Opposition sustained on likelihood of confusion — BOSS AUDIO SYSTEMS v. AUDIO BSS USA — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: AUDIO BSS USA, BOSS AUDIO SYSTEMS · No. 91125266
  65. Opposition decided in part on likelihood of confusion — TUNDRA SPORT v. TUNDRA — TTAB opposition decision, mixed · precedential · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: TUNDRA, TUNDRA SPORT, TUNDRA SPORT, TUNDRA SPORT · No. 91116242
  66. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — TRUE BLUE FARMS — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: TRUE BLUE FARMS · No. 76564036
  67. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — SCRIPPS — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: SCRIPPS · No. 76077292
  68. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — COLOR WAVE — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: COLOR WAVE · No. 78472642
  69. Refusal reversed — DPOF — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal reversed · marks: DPOF · No. 75580709
  70. Opposition dismissed on likelihood of confusion — MAGICOLOR — TTAB opposition decision, dismissed · Likelihood of Confusion, Section 2(a), Section 43(c) - Dilution · marks: MAGICOLOR · No. 91168421
  71. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — FREESTYLE FLYER — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: FREESTYLE FLYER · No. 76520976
  72. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — UCS DUNGAREE CO. — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: UCS DUNGAREE CO. · No. 76567513
  73. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — FABLESS SOFTWARE COMPANY — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: FABLESS SOFTWARE COMPANY · No. 76547170
  74. Refusal decided in part on likelihood of confusion — Calcium Software Limited — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, mixed · Likelihood of Confusion · No. 78377250RE
  75. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — VECTOR ACCESS TECHNOLOGY — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: VECTOR ACCESS TECHNOLOGY · No. 78304641
  76. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — TIRAMISU BY ISABELLA — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: TIRAMISU BY ISABELLA · No. 76586779
  77. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — HELLO WORLD — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: HELLO WORLD · No. 78456723
  78. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — SUNFLOWER BRONZER — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: SUNFLOWER BRONZER · No. 76622251
  79. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — SUPRO — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: SUPRO · No. 78383898
  80. Refusal affirmed — WIRELESS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · marks: WIRELESS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY · No. 76592393
  81. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — LOVEJOY DAY SPA & SHOP — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: LOVEJOY DAY SPA & SHOP · No. 78463524
  82. Opposition sustained on likelihood of confusion — BIG-O v. BIG 10 TIRES — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: BIG 10 TIRES, BIG-O, BIG O · No. 91078343
  83. Petition to cancel granted on likelihood of confusion — LA PALAPA — TTAB cancellation decision, granted · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: LA PALAPA · No. 92043837
  84. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — PROGRAMMED PROTEIN — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: PROGRAMMED PROTEIN · No. 78448489
  85. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — MAXIMUM MARKETING — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: MAXIMUM MARKETING · No. 78549135
  86. Opposition sustained on likelihood of confusion — HOT WHEELS v. HOTTOYZ — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: HOTTOYZ, HOT WHEELS · No. 91123052
  87. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — MESA — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: MESA · No. 78495253
  88. Opposition decided in part on likelihood of confusion — Robert Kaufhold v. Robert P. Yeomans — TTAB opposition decision, mixed · Likelihood of Confusion · No. 91160771RE
  89. Order: Request for Recon-sideration Denied(Opposi-tion Dismissed) — ESPN, Inc. v. Kurt Luttermoser — TTAB opposition decision, dismissed · Likelihood of Confusion, Section 2(a), Section 43(c) - Dilution, Section 2(f) · No. 91158096RE
  90. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — LIP CONCENTRATE — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: LIP CONCENTRATE · No. 76438105
  91. Opposition sustained on likelihood of confusion — THE BLACK DOG — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: THE BLACK DOG · No. 91150887
  92. Opposition sustained on likelihood of confusion — THE BLACK DOG — TTAB opposition decision, sustained · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: THE BLACK DOG · No. 91151592
  93. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(4) - primarily merely a surname — ABANTE — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Section 2(e)(4) - Primarily Merely a Surname · marks: ABANTE · No. 78461678
  94. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — CWS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: CWS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES · No. 78314665
  95. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — OMEGA METER — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: OMEGA METER · No. 75334378
  96. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — CHILLY PAD — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers, Requirements · marks: CHILLY PAD · No. 76565906
  97. Opposition dismissed on likelihood of confusion — CAZADORES — TTAB opposition decision, dismissed · Likelihood of Confusion, Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: CAZADORES · No. 91161729
  98. Refusal reversed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — GAMESTUDIO — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal reversed · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: GAMESTUDIO · No. 78389911
  99. Refusal affirmed on section §2(e)(1) descriptive/generic/disclaimers — PHYSICIAN ENDORSED — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive/Generic/Disclaimers · marks: PHYSICIAN ENDORSED · No. 78976952
  100. Refusal affirmed on likelihood of confusion — MORNING MIST — TTAB ex parte appeal decision, refusal affirmed · Likelihood of Confusion · marks: MORNING MIST · No. 78434777

Open this year on Rightsy